<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Osteoscoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.osteoscoop.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com</link>
	<description>A weekly e-newsletter on Osteoporosis.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Strontium ranelate has higher effects than alendronate on bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal osteoporosis</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/09/07/strontium-ranelate-has-higher-effects-than-alendronate-on-bone-microarchitecture-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/09/07/strontium-ranelate-has-higher-effects-than-alendronate-on-bone-microarchitecture-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strontium ranelate and alendronate are antiosteoporotic agents with proven antifracture efficacy against vertebral and nonvertebral fractures (including hip). Whereas alendronate is a bone resorption inhibitor, strontium ranelate increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. For the first time, a study [1] noninvasively evaluated and compared, in a head-to-head trial, the effects of strontium ranelate and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strontium ranelate and alendronate are antiosteoporotic agents with proven antifracture efficacy against vertebral and nonvertebral fractures (including hip). Whereas alendronate is a bone resorption inhibitor, strontium ranelate increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. For the first time, a study [1] noninvasively evaluated and compared, in a head-to-head trial, the effects of strontium ranelate and alendronate on bone microstructure, a component of bone quality, and hence of bone strength, in osteoporotic women.<span id="more-727"></span>Eighty-eight women ≥50 years old with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to strontium ranelate 2g/day or alendronate 70 mg/week for 2 years. Microstructure of weight-bearing bone distal tibia was assessed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT, Xtreme CT, Scanco Medical) after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. A preplanned interim statistical analysis was performed after 1 year in the intention-to-treat population (ie, patients with a baseline and post-baseline assessable HR-pQCT examination, n=85). The primary end point was HR-pQCT variables relative changes from baseline, secondary end points included lumbar spine and hip areal BMD and bone turnover markers.</p>
<p>Baseline characteristics (age, lumbar and hip T-Score) were similar in both groups. After 1 year of treatment, mean increases were +5.3% (P&lt;0.001) for cortical thickness, +2.0% (P=0.002) for bone volume (BV/TV) and +2.1% (P=0.002) for trabecular density in the strontium ranelate group, whereas there was no significant change in the alendronate group, with thus a significant between-group difference in favour of strontium ranelate (P=0.045, P=0.048 and P=0.035, for cortical thickness, BV/TV and trabecular density, respectively). The increase in C.Th with strontium ranelate was +2.9%  at 3 months versus baseline (P&lt;0.001) and was greater than in the alendronate group (P=0.012).</p>
<p>In conclusion, strontium ranelate had significantly higher effects than alendronate on both cortical and trabecular microstructure, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis after one year of treatment. This effect is significant within 3 months of treatment.</p>
<ol>
<li>Rizzoli R, Laroche M, Krieg MA, et al. <em>Rheumatol Int.</em> 2010;30(10):1341-1348.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/09/07/strontium-ranelate-has-higher-effects-than-alendronate-on-bone-microarchitecture-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vertebral fracture status and the WHO risk factors for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/31/vertebral-fracture-status-and-the-who-risk-factors-for-predicting-osteoporotic-fracture-risk/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/31/vertebral-fracture-status-and-the-who-risk-factors-for-predicting-osteoporotic-fracture-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture, and patients with prevalent vertebral fractures have a greater risk of future fractures. However, radiographically determined vertebral fractures are not identified as a distinct risk factor in the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool. The objective of this study [1] was to evaluate and compare [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture, and patients with prevalent vertebral fractures have a greater risk of future fractures. However, radiographically determined vertebral fractures are not identified as a distinct risk factor in the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool. The objective of this study [1] was to evaluate and compare potential risk factors including morphometric spine fracture status and the WHO risk factors for predicting 5-y fracture risk. It was hypothesized that spine fracture status provides prognostic information in addition to consideration of the WHO risk factors alone. A randomly selected, population-based community cohort of 2761 noninstitutionalized men and women &gt; 50 y of age living within 50 km of one of nine regional centers was enrolled in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS), a prospective and longitudinal cohort study following subjects for 5 y. Prevalent and incident spine fractures were identified from lateral spine radiographs. Incident nonvertebral fragility fractures were determined by an annual, mailed fracture questionnaire with validation, and nonvertebral fragility fracture was defined by investigators as a fracture with minimal trauma.<span id="more-724"></span>A model considering the WHO risk factors plus spine fracture status provided greater prognostic information regarding future fracture risk than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. In univariate analyses, age, BMD, and spine fracture status had the highest gradient of risk. A model considering these three risk factors captured almost all of the predictive information provided by a model considering spine fracture status plus the WHO risk factors and provided greater predictive information than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone.<br />
The use of spine fracture status along with age and BMD predicted future fracture risk with greater simplicity and higher prognostic accuracy than consideration of the risk factors included in the WHO tool.</p>
<ol>
<li>Chen P et al. <em>J Bone Miner Res.</em> 2009; 24: 495–502.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/31/vertebral-fracture-status-and-the-who-risk-factors-for-predicting-osteoporotic-fracture-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral  fractures: is it efficient?</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/24/vertebroplasty-for-osteoporotic-vertebral-fractures-is-it-efficient/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/24/vertebroplasty-for-osteoporotic-vertebral-fractures-is-it-efficient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Non classé]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vertebroplasty is commonly used to treat painful, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Two recent studies [1,2] evaluated the efficiency of this procedure. In a multicenter trial [1], the authors randomly assigned 131 patients who had one to three painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures to undergo either vertebroplasty or a simulated procedure without cement (control group). The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Vertebroplasty is commonly used to treat painful, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Two recent studies [1,2] evaluated the efficiency of this procedure. In a multicenter trial [1], the authors randomly assigned 131 patients who had one to three painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures to undergo either vertebroplasty or a simulated procedure without cement (control group). The primary outcomes were scores on the modified Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) (on a scale of 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating greater disability) and patients’ ratings of average pain intensity during the preceding 24 hours at 1 month (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain). Patients were allowed to cross over to the other study group after 1 month.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">All patients underwent the assigned intervention (68 vertebroplasties and 63 simulated procedures). The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At 1 month, there was no significant difference between the vertebroplasty group and the control group in either the RDQ score or the pain rating. Both groups had immediate improvement in disability and pain scores after the intervention. Although the two groups did not differ significantly on any secondary outcome measure at 1 month, there was a trend toward a higher rate of clinically meaningful improvement in pain (a 30% decrease from baseline) in the vertebroplasty group (64% vs. 48%, P=0.06). At 3 months, there was a higher crossover rate in the control group than in the vertebroplasty group (43% vs 12%, P&lt;0.001). There was one serious adverse event in each group.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The second study [2] was also a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 78 participants with one or two painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures that were of less than 12 months’ duration and unhealed, as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, were randomly assigned to undergo vertebroplasty or a sham procedure. Similar improvements were seen in both groups with respect to pain at night and at rest, physical functioning, quality of life, and perceived improvement.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In conclusion, improvements in pain and pain-related disability associated with osteoporotic compression fractures in patients treated with vertebroplasty were similar to the improvements in a control group. These studies found no beneficial effect of vertebroplasty as compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, up to 6 months after treatment.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">
<em>1. Kallmes DF et al. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:569-579.<br />
2. Buchbinder R et al. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:557-568.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/24/vertebroplasty-for-osteoporotic-vertebral-fractures-is-it-efficient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early smoking is associated with peak bone mass and prevalent fractures in young, healthy men</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/17/early-smoking-is-associated-with-peak-bone-mass-and-prevalent-fractures-in-young-healthy-men/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/17/early-smoking-is-associated-with-peak-bone-mass-and-prevalent-fractures-in-young-healthy-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pathophysiology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Physiology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[androgens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[estrogens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[peak bone mass]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smoking is associated with lower areal bone mineral density and higher fracture risk, although most evidence has been derived from studies in elderly subjects. This study [1] investigates smoking habits in relation to areal and volumetric bone parameters and fracture prevalence in young, healthy males at peak bone mass. Healthy male siblings (n=677) at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Smoking is associated with lower areal bone mineral density and higher fracture risk, although most evidence has been derived from studies in elderly subjects. This study [1] investigates smoking habits in relation to areal and volumetric bone parameters and fracture prevalence in young, healthy males at peak bone mass. Healthy male siblings (n=677) at the age of peak bone mass (25 to 45 years) were recruited in a cross-sectional population-based study. Trabecular and cortical bone parameters of the radius and cortical bone parameters of the tibia were assessed using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Areal bone mass was determined using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Sex steroids and bone markers were determined using immunoassays. Prevalent fractures and smoking habits were assessed using questionnaires.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Self-reported fractures were more prevalent in the current and early smokers than in the never smokers (P&lt;.05), with a fracture prevalence odds ratio for early smokers of 1.96 after adjustment for age, weight, educational level, and alcohol use and exclusion of childhood fractures. Current smoking was associated with a significantly larger endosteal circumference and a decreased cortical thickness at the tibia. <span id="more-719"></span>In particular, early smokers (&lt;16 years) had a high fracture risk and lower areal BMD, together with a lower cortical bone area at the tibia and lower trabecular and cortical bone density at the radius. An interaction between free estradiol and current smoking was observed in statistical models predicting cortical area and thickness.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In conclusion, smoking at a young age is associated with unfavorable bone geometry and density and is associated with increased fracture prevalence, providing arguments for a disturbed acquisition of peak bone mass during puberty by smoking, possibly owing to an interaction with sex steroid action.</p>
<p>1. Taes Y et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:379-387.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/17/early-smoking-is-associated-with-peak-bone-mass-and-prevalent-fractures-in-young-healthy-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/10/effect-of-osteoporosis-treatment-on-mortality/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/10/effect-of-osteoporosis-treatment-on-mortality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fragility fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality. Effective osteoporosis treatment can reduce fracture incidence, but it is not clear whether it reduces mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis study [1] was to determine whether effective osteoporosis treatment reduces mortality. The authors searched Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Trials prior to September 2008, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragility fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality. Effective osteoporosis treatment can reduce fracture incidence, but it is not clear whether it reduces mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis study [1] was to determine whether effective osteoporosis treatment reduces mortality. The authors searched Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Trials prior to September 2008, as well as 2000–2008 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research conference abstracts. Eligible studies were randomized placebo-controlled trials of approved doses of medications with proven efficacy in preventing both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, in which the study duration was longer than 12 months and there were more than 10 deaths. Trials of estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators were specifically excluded. Data were extracted from the text of the retrieved articles, published meta-analyses, or the Food and Drug Administration web site.</p>
<p><span id="more-708"></span>Eight eligible studies of four agents (risedronate, strontium ranelate, zoledronic acid, and denosumab) were included in the primary analysis. During two alendronate studies, the treatment dose changed, and those studies were only included in secondary analyses. In the primary analysis, treatment was associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (relative risk, 0.89; P &lt; 0.036). In the secondary analysis, the results were similar (relative risk, 0.90; P &lt; 0.044). Mortality reduction was not related to age or incidence of hip or nonvertebral fracture, but was greatest in trials conducted in populations with higher mortality rates.</p>
<p>In conclusion, treatments for osteoporosis with established vertebral and nonvertebral fracture efficacy reduce mortality in older, frailer individuals with osteoporosis who are at high risk of fracture.</p>
<ol>
<li>Bolland MJ et al. <em>J Clin Endocrinol Metab.</em> 2010;95:1174-1181.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/10/effect-of-osteoporosis-treatment-on-mortality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QFractureScores for predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/03/qfracturescores-for-predicting-risk-of-osteoporotic-fracture/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/03/qfracturescores-for-predicting-risk-of-osteoporotic-fracture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The objective of this study [1] was to develop and validate two new fracture risk algorithms (QFractureScores) for estimating the individual risk of osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture over 10 years. For this purpose, the authors used a prospective open cohort study with routinely collected data from 357 general practices to develop the scores and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The objective of this study [1] was to develop and validate two new fracture risk algorithms (QFractureScores) for estimating the individual risk of osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture over 10 years. For this purpose, the authors used a prospective open cohort study with routinely collected data from 357 general practices to develop the scores and from 178 practices to validate the scores, in England and Wales. Participants were 1 183 663 women and 1 174 232 men aged 30 to 85 in the derivation cohort, who contributed 7 898 208 and 8 049 306 person years of observation, respectively. There were 24 350 incident diagnoses of osteoporotic fracture in women and 7934 in men, and 9302 incident diagnoses of hip fracture in women and 5424 in men. The main outcome measures were first (incident) diagnosis of osteoporotic fracture (vertebral, distal radius, or hip) and incident hip fracture recorded in general practice records.</p>
<p><span id="more-695"></span></p>
<p>Use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, recorded alcohol use, parental history of osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, asthma, tricyclic antidepressants, corticosteroids, history of falls, menopausal symptoms, chronic liver disease, gastrointestinal malabsorption, and other endocrine disorders were significantly and independently associated with risk of osteoporotic fracture in women. Some variables were significantly associated with risk of osteoporotic fracture but not with risk of hip fracture. The predictors for men for osteoporotic and hip fracture were age, BMI, smoking status, recorded alcohol use, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, asthma, tricyclic antidepressants, corticosteroids, history of falls, and liver disease. The hip fracture algorithm had the best performance among men and women. It explained 63.94% of the variation in women and 63.19% of the variation in men. The ROC statistics for hip fracture were also high: 0.89 in women and 0.86 for men versus 0.79 and 0.69, respectively, for the osteoporotic fracture outcome. The algorithms were well calibrated with predicted risks closely matching observed risks. The QFractureScore for hip fracture also had good performance for discrimination and calibration compared with the FRAX (fracture risk assessment) algorithm.</p>
<p>These new algorithms can predict risk of fracture in primary care populations in the UK without laboratory measurements and are therefore suitable for use in both clinical settings and for self assessment (www.qfracture.org). QFractureScores could be used to identify patients at high risk of fracture who might benefit from interventions to reduce their risk.</p>
<ol>
<li>Hippisley-Cox J et al. <em>BMJ.</em> 2009;339:b4229 doi:10.1136/bmj.b4229.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/08/03/qfracturescores-for-predicting-risk-of-osteoporotic-fracture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vitamin D insufficiency is a major cause of postmenopausal osteoporosis worldwide</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/27/vitamin-d-insufficiency-is-a-major-cause-of-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-worldwide/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/27/vitamin-d-insufficiency-is-a-major-cause-of-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-worldwide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor vitamin D status is common in the elderly and is associated with bone loss and fractures. The aim of this study [1] was to assess worldwide vitamin D status in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis according to latitude and economic status, in relation to parathyroid function, bone turnover markers, and BMD. The study was performed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor vitamin D status is common in the elderly and is associated with bone loss and fractures. The aim of this study [1] was to assess worldwide vitamin D status in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis according to latitude and economic status, in relation to parathyroid function, bone turnover markers, and BMD. The study was performed in 7441 postmenopausal women from 29 countries participating in a clinical trial, with BMD T-score at the femoral neck or lumbar spine < -2.5 or one to five mild or moderate vertebral fractures. Serum 25(OH)D, PTH, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone turnover markers osteocalcin (OC) and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX), and BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter were measured.</p>
<p><span id="more-689"></span>The mean serum 25(OH)D level was 61.2 ± 22.4 nM. The prevalence of 25(OH)D <25, 25–50, 50–75, and >75 nM was 5.9%, 29.4%, 43.5%, and 21.2%, respectively, in winter and 3.0%, 22.2%, 47.2%, and 27.5% in summer. Worldwide, a negative correlation between 25(OH)D and latitude was observed. With increasing 25(OH)D categories of <25, 25–50, 50–75, and >75 nM, mean PTH, OC, and CTX were decreasing (P< 0.001), whereas BMD of all sites was increasing (P< 0.001). A threshold in the positive relationship between 25(OH)D and different BMD parameters was visible at a 25(OH)D level of 50 nM.</p>
<p>This study showed a high prevalence of low 25(OH)D in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis worldwide. Along with latitude, affluence seems to be an important factor for serum 25(OH)D level, especially in Europe, where it is strongly correlated with latitude.</p>
<ol>
<li>Kuchuk NO et al. <em>J Bone Miner Res.</em> 2009;24:693-701.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/27/vitamin-d-insufficiency-is-a-major-cause-of-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-worldwide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bcl-xL inhibits the bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/21/bcl-xl-inhibits-the-bone-resorbing-activity-of-osteoclasts/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/21/bcl-xl-inhibits-the-bone-resorbing-activity-of-osteoclasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Pathophysiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family member Bcl-xL has a well-characterized antiapoptotic function in lymphoid cells. However, its functions in other cells - including osteoclasts, which are of hematopoietic origin - and other cellular processes remain unknown. The authors of a recent study [1] report an unexpected function of Bcl-xL in attenuating the bone-resorbing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family member Bcl-xL has a well-characterized antiapoptotic function in lymphoid cells. However, its functions in other cells - including osteoclasts, which are of hematopoietic origin - and other cellular processes remain unknown. The authors of a recent study [1] report an unexpected function of Bcl-xL in attenuating the bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts in mice. To investigate the role of Bcl-xL in osteoclasts, they generated mice with osteoclast-specific conditional deletion of Bcl-x.</p>
<p><span id="more-686"></span>Although the Bcl-x knockout mice grew normally with no apparent morphological abnormalities, they developed substantial osteopenia at 1 year of age, which was caused by increased bone resorption. Bcl-x deficiency increased the bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts despite their high susceptibility to apoptosis, whereas Bcl-xL overexpression produced the opposite effect. In addition, Bcl-x knockout osteoclasts displayed increased levels of vitronectin and fibronectin expression.</p>
<p>These results suggest that Bcl-xL attenuates osteoclastic bone-resorbing activity through the decreased production of extracellular matrix proteins, such as vitronectin and fibronectin, and thus provides evidence for a novel cellular function of Bcl-xL.</p>
<ol>
<li>Iwasawa M et al. <em>J Clin Invest.</em> 2009;119:3149-3159.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/21/bcl-xl-inhibits-the-bone-resorbing-activity-of-osteoclasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Childhood fractures do not predict future fractures</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/13/childhood-fractures-do-not-predict-future-fractures/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/13/childhood-fractures-do-not-predict-future-fractures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Childhood fractures are common. Their clinical relevance to osteoporosis and fractures in later life is unclear. The aim of this study [1] was to determine the predictive risk of childhood fracture on the risk of fracture in later life. Men and women >50 y of age were recruited from population registers for participation in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Childhood fractures are common. Their clinical relevance to osteoporosis and fractures in later life is unclear. The aim of this study [1] was to determine the predictive risk of childhood fracture on the risk of fracture in later life. Men and women >50 y of age were recruited from population registers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Subjects completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire that included questions about previous fractures and the age at which the first of these fractures occurred. Lateral spine radiographs were performed to ascertain prevalent vertebral deformities. Subjects were followed prospectively by postal questionnaire to determine the occurrence of clinical fractures. A subsample of subjects had BMD measurements performed. A cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the predictive risk of childhood fracture between the ages of 8 and 18 y on the risk of future limb fracture and logistic regression was used to determine the association between reported childhood fractures and prevalent vertebral deformity.</p>
<p><span id="more-681"></span>A total of 6451 men (mean age, 63.8 y) and 6936 women (mean age, 63.1 y) were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up time was 3 y. Of these, 574 (8.9%) men and 313 (4.5%) women reported a first fracture (any site) between the ages of 8 and 18 y. A recalled history of any childhood fracture or forearm fracture was not associated with an increased risk of future limb fracture or prevalent vertebral deformity in either men or women. Among the 4807 subjects who had DXA measurements, there was no difference in bone mass among those subjects who had reported a childhood fracture and those who did not.</p>
<p>These data suggest that self-reported previous childhood fracture is not associated with an increased risk of future fracture in men or women.</p>
<ol>
<li>Pye SR et al. <em>J Bone Miner Res.</em> 2009;24:1314–1318.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/13/childhood-fractures-do-not-predict-future-fractures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hip fracture incidence in relation to age, menopausal status, and age at menopause</title>
		<link>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/06/hip-fracture-incidence-in-relation-to-age-menopausal-status-and-age-at-menopause/</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Osteoscoop]]></author>
		<comments>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/06/hip-fracture-incidence-in-relation-to-age-menopausal-status-and-age-at-menopause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osteoscoop.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bone mineral density is known to decrease rapidly after the menopause. There is limited evidence about the separate contributions of a woman’s age, menopausal status and age at menopause to the incidence of hip fracture. Over one million middle-aged women joined the UK Million Women Study in 1996–2001 providing information on their menopausal status, age [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bone mineral density is known to decrease rapidly after the menopause. There is limited evidence about the separate contributions of a woman’s age, menopausal status and age at menopause to the incidence of hip fracture. Over one million middle-aged women joined the UK Million Women Study in 1996–2001 providing information on their menopausal status, age at menopause, and other factors, which was updated, where possible, 3 y later. All women were registered with the UK National Health Service (NHS) and were routinely linked to information on cause-specific admissions to NHS hospitals. 561,609 women who had never used hormone replacement therapy and who provided complete information on menopausal variables (at baseline 25% were pre/perimenopausal and 75% postmenopausal) were followed up for a total of 3.4 million woman-years (an average 6.2 y per woman).</p>
<p><span id="more-675"></span>During follow-up, 1,676 (0.3%) were admitted to hospital with a first incident hip fracture. Among women aged 50-54 y the relative risk (RR) of hip fracture was significantly higher in postmenopausal than premenopausal women (adjusted RR 2.22); there were too few premenopausal women aged 55 y and over for valid comparisons. Among postmenopausal women, hip fracture incidence increased steeply with age (p<0.001), with rates being about seven times higher at age 70-74 y than at 50-54 y (incidence rates of 0.82 versus 0.11 per 100 women over 5 y). Among postmenopausal women of a given age there was no significant difference in hip fracture incidence between women whose menopause was due to bilateral oophorectomy compared with a natural menopause (adjusted RR 1.20), and age at menopause had little, if any, effect on hip fracture incidence.</p>
<p>In conclusion, at around the time of the menopause, hip fracture incidence is about twice as high in postmenopausal as in premenopausal women, but this effect is short-lived. Among postmenopausal women, age is by far the main determinant of hip fracture incidence and, for women of a given age, their age at menopause has, at most, a weak additional effect.</p>
<ol>
<li>Banks E, et al. <em>PLoS Med</em>. 2009;6:e1000181.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000181.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osteoscoop.com/2010/07/06/hip-fracture-incidence-in-relation-to-age-menopausal-status-and-age-at-menopause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
